Search for: "North Dakota v. United States"
Results 361 - 380
of 621
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm
North Dakota v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 8:39 pm
North Dakota, 136 S.Ct. 2160 (2016). [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
The state and its instrumentalities tend to be risk averse--the essence of the ideology of compliance based governmentality. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:33 pm
He does have a co-blogger and an occasional co-author who is currently a Floridian, but what about a blogger at, say, the University of North Dakota who has exactly zero contact with Florida? [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
When the Supreme Court entertains argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
CMS stated in the memorandum that it has appealed both decisions, the State of Missouri, et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:17 pm
North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), and "levels the playing field" between local and out-of-state retailers. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
United States is met, or whether, as the U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
The law in states attempting to cap medical malpractice lawsuits and damages had been stricken down in Illinois, Missouri, Alabama, Georgia, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Oregon, Washington and Wisconsin. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:38 pm
United States, a case involving a Corps of Engineers construction project in North Dakota. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians and United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, and Vermont permit recovery of filial consortium damages pursuant to interpretations of statutory language such as ‘pecuniary loss,’ ‘general loss,’ and ‘fair and just. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 10:13 am
Sugar beets provide about one half of the sugar in the United States and growers are concerned that if GM seeds cannot be used, there will not be enough conventional seed to plant next year. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:57 am
" Judge Orders Interior to Re-examine Water Pipeline Plan "A federal judge in Washington has ordered the Interior Department to re-examine its plans to divert water from the Missouri River into an arid section of North Dakota, granting requests from both the state of Missouri and the Canadian province of Manitoba, which united against the project. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[27] The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:55 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:15 am
A decision is now awaited on the North Dakota law. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:43 am
United States v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:01 am
North Dakota, and the inability of legislators, state employees, and citizens to understand the limitations of the Due Process Clause. [read post]
