Search for: "North Dakota v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2018, 9:52 am
On June 23, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued North Dakota v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:38 pm
SUPREME COURT RULES THAT DUI BLOOD TEST REQUIRES A WARRANT On June 23, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in the case Birchfield v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:38 pm
SUPREME COURT RULES THAT DUI BLOOD TEST REQUIRES A WARRANT On June 23, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in the case Birchfield v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 1:54 pm
North Dakota (14-1468); Bernard v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 9:15 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1:16-cv-01796-JEB: “MINUTE ORDER: As explained in open court following today’s hearing, the Court ORDERS that Dakota Access’s 80 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED and its Motion for Preliminary Injunction is WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:45 am
In North Dakota, punishment for this “crime” is equivalent to that of a OUI/DUI conviction. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 8:39 am
In North Dakota v. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
The Supreme Court of the United State’s ruling in Birchfield v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
In light of the preliminary injunctions in North Dakota and Texas, EPA said that both agencies are interpreting “waters of the United States” consistent with the pre-2015 regulatory regime in the 26 states where the WOTUS Rule is blocked “until further notice. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
In light of the preliminary injunctions in North Dakota and Texas, EPA said that both agencies are interpreting “waters of the United States” consistent with the pre-2015 regulatory regime in the 26 states where the WOTUS Rule is blocked “until further notice. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
In light of the preliminary injunctions in North Dakota and Texas, EPA said that both agencies are interpreting “waters of the United States” consistent with the pre-2015 regulatory regime in the 26 states where the WOTUS Rule is blocked “until further notice. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:51 pm
North Dakota, which was decided by the United States Supreme Court in 2016, continues to raise questions in courts throughout the country as to how DUI cases can be prosecuted and what evidence can be admitted against defendants charged with DUI. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 7:43 am
This list was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 9:56 am
In June 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued Birchfield v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 9:56 am
In June 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued Birchfield v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:59 am
North Dakota, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a warrant is required to obtain a blood test from a DUI suspect, and that a DUI suspect could not face criminal penalties for refusing to submit to a warrantless blood test. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm
North Dakota. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:44 am
Over forty years ago, it insists, the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:40 pm
" United States v. [read post]
