Search for: "North v. Peters"
Results 301 - 320
of 615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2011, 11:50 pm
R v Peter and Frances Kavanagh – Salford Magistrates Court This is another failure to comply with selective licensing. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm
Peter Tillers recounts at http://tillerstillers.blogspot.com/2010/08/be-nice-on-your-way-up-but-kick-them.html: I did research for James H. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am
For more reading, see “ERISA Severance Plans and Non-Compete Agreements Must Work Together,” by Peter Land. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL’s efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal’s ‘one-size-fits-all’ fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims – ActionAid’s unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO… [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
In contrast, the independent-counsel statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 1:07 pm
Supreme Court in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The full list of resolved complaints from last week: Mr Peter Reynolds v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 20/04/2012; Samaritans, Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, Sane and PAPYRUS Prevention of Young Suicide v The Sun, Clause 5, 19/04/2012; Mr Adam Stephens v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Harborough Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mrs Drene Brown v Scunthorpe Telegraph, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; A woman v Hastings and… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm
ACTION NOTICE DATE CLAIM DUE DATE 2014-47 SEC v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 10:01 am
In July 2008, writing as “Peter Kaufman, Ph.D. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Justice Richter observed that in Bast v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
– Marks & Clerk Biotechnology Report 2008: (IP finance), Pfizer and Daiichi-Sankyo’s bidding for Ranbaxy: (IP ThinkTank), (IAM), (Managing Intellectual Property), (GenericsWeb), Cutting Edge Information study reveals 53% of pharma patents approach expiration before litigation strategies are implemented: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), Quanta and agricultural biotechnology: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Breakthough by WHO will give poor countries… [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
(See Lawfare analysis of the opinion from Peter Margulies and Josh Blackman.) [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
Baxter Healthcare Corp (Gray on Claims) District Court E D Texas: Qui tam plaintiff cites Professor Crouch’s question to readers as proof that patent expiration dates are not readily ascertainable: North Texas Patent Group, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:16 am
From a panel decision Bennie v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(Patent Prospector) US Patents Congress weighs patent specialisation for federal judges (Ars Technica) (Inventive Step) (Law360) (IP Spotlight) (Patent Prospector) M Lemley & B Sampat’s report ‘Examiner Characteristics and the Patent Grant Rate’ – experienced examiners allow more, cite less (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) PTO problems are not new; the more things change, the more they stay the same (Inventive Step) Peer to… [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:50 am
The IPKat's friend, IP practitioner and fellow blogger Peter Groves is very excited that his IP Dictionary has now been published by Edward Elgar Publishing. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
446/09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd, Far East Sourcing Ltd, Röhlig Hong Kong Ltd and Röhlig Belgium NV and C? [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
New York: North Point Press, 2014.Fiordalis, David V., ed. [read post]
