Search for: "Northern Cheyenne Indian Tribe"
Results 21 - 40
of 58
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
United States, 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
30 May 2018, 2:49 pm
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
30 May 2018, 9:19 am
United States, 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
25 May 2018, 11:00 am
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am
John Elwood (finally) reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:38 pm
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
Respondent Patrick Dwayne Murphy is a member of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation of Indians. [read post]
11 May 2018, 9:00 am
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians Executive Director, Arlington, W.A. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
John Elwood finally reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:10 am
United States: bearcomesout cert petition Question presented: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists any longer where Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s Constitution in this case such that Petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the… [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 7:10 am
Bearcomesout: Opening Brief An excerpt: Because the Northern Cheyenne Constitution cedes almost unfettered authority to the federal government, Ms. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:49 pm
The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, and Yankton Sioux Tribe, with Earthjustice and the American Indian Law Clinic – UC Boulder, submitted a Request for Precautionary Measures Pursuant to Article 25 of the IACHR Rules of Procedure Concerning Serious and Urgent Risks of Irreparable Harm Arising Out of Construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline to the IACHR. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:53 pm
Labre is funded by private donations and not tied to the Northern Cheyenne Tribe. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 5:51 am
Lastly, we did a field trip course across Indian Country in Montana last spring and I think it’s fair to say that our most powerful and striking visit was to Northern Cheyenne. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 10:35 am
Recall in Chapter 1 how NSR criticizes Crow, Northern Cheyenne, and Indians in general for not trying hard enough to be rich? [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am
TNToT’s Attack on the Northern Cheyenne Tribe NSR’s main source on the Crow and Northern Cheyenne reservations is Ivan Small, the director of the St. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:50 am
This book focuses on a small number of Indian nations around the country — Crow Nation, Northern Cheyenne Tribe, Seneca Nation of Indians, Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina, Oglala Sioux Tribe, and Rosebud Sioux Tribe. [read post]
