Search for: "Novell v. Microsoft"
Results 21 - 40
of 263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2009, 7:57 am
Several recent reports suggest that these contributions were not voluntary and Microsoft had included GPLv2 licensed code in these drivers http://linux-network-plumber.blogspot.com/2009/07/congratulations-microsoft.html (Steve Hemminger of Vyatta) and http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/microsoft-linux-hyper-v-drivers.html (Greg Kroah-Hartman of Novell). [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court recently agreed to hear an important electronic privacy case, United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 10:17 am
Microsoft's Patent No. 7,640,272 has a short Summary of the Invention section which says it all: "Audio/video (A/V) content is analyzed using speech and language analysis components. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:28 pm
Similar claims are made in the Complaint against: Microsoft Advertising service; Amazon's targeted product ads service; Yahoo's Smart Ads service; and Vibrant's In-Text Ads service. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 1:50 pm
To maintain Apple’s exclusive rights to the APP STORE name, Apple’s lawyers will have to craft some novel “non-generic” arguments. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 5:05 pm
Novell, letting stand a lower court decision which allowed Novell to sue Microsoft despite not competing in the operating system market In textbook news, the Third Edition of the Gavil, Kovacic and Baker’s Antitrust Law in Perspective is estimated to be available by May 22, 2008; Einer Elhauge has also just released his own new textbook on U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:47 am
The Microsoft Azure IP Advantage program is a novel and non-obvious approach to assuaging patent fears associated with the cloud. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:58 am
” Kelley v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 12:31 am
Case History The EU investigation against Microsoft was triggered by a complaint about "certain anticompetitive practices" by Novell, another U.S. software firm. [3] However, the EU was not the first governmental entity to brand Microsoft as anti-competitive. [4] In 1999, U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:09 pm
It’s a pretty novel question not briefed by the parties. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 1:17 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
For the IELR Blog’s past coverage of the U.S. v Microsoft case, see here. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
For the IELR Blog’s past coverage of the U.S. v Microsoft case, see here. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 9:16 am
Microsoft relied on McLaughlin v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am
But the Federal Patent Court still did not find the patent novel and inventive over the prior art even if limited to push notifications.Motorola can and presumably will appeal yesterday's ruling to the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH, Federal Court of Justice). [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 8:14 am
Research in Motion (S) $536 - Novell v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 1:36 pm
This was the very issue in the Microsoft v. i4i dispute. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:27 pm
” Notably, in Authors Guild v. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 5:17 am
Microsoft once faced that threat. [read post]
