Search for: "Novick v. Novick"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2016, 11:35 am
State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 10:02 pm
In Novick v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 10:00 pm
In Novick v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 12:08 pm
Novick v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 4:16 am
Here, in Birch v Novick & Assoc., P.C. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
Despite the attention given to the Supreme Court’s opinions in *Plessy v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:18 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 3:05 am
Subsequent attorney grounds "As defendant did not represent plaintiff in the underlying accounting action at the time the conditional order of preclusion was issued or in the next 30 days, during which plaintiff was to provide outstanding discovery, he was not responsible for plaintiff's answer being stricken (see Maksimiak v Schwartzapfel Novick Truhowsky Marcus, P.C., 82 AD3d 652 [2011]). [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 1:13 pm
Novick v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 1:09 pm
Novick v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:34 am
” It would happen in a case that was aptly named New York Times Co. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 3:07 am
They lost in the Supreme Court in a 5-to-4 decision in 1973 (Gilligan v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 11:39 pm
Clearly Novick was not a member of the firm and thus Costella could not satisfy the “organization” test. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 5:02 am
Where documentary evidence establishes that successor counsel had sufficient time and opportunity to adequately protect plaintiff’s rights, prior counsel’s alleged negligence cannot be considered a proximate cause of plaintiff’s alleged damages (Maksimiak v Schwartzapfel Novick Truhowsky Marcus, P.C., 82 AD3d 652, 652 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:45 am
Cir. 227 (Alexandria Jul. 22, 1998) and Novick v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:38 am
Indeed, we note that the record establishes that defendant afforded plaintiff and her successor counsel "sufficient time and opportunity to adequately protect plaintiff's rights" (Somma v Dansker & Aspromonte Assoc., 44 AD3d 376, 377; see Maksimiak v Schwartzapfel Novick Truhowsky Marcus, P.C., 82 AD3d 652; Katz v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., 48 AD3d 640, 641; cf. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:41 pm
My colleague Wayne Novick of Ohio recent explained reaffirmations in a series of blogs – including one entitled, “Reaffirmations: Cars Trucks Things with Wheels”. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 7:35 pm
Novick v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:59 am
This is the case where successor counsel had “sufficient time and opportunity to adequately protect plaintiff’s rights,” but failed to do so (Maksimiak v Schwartzapfel Novick Truhowsky Marcus, P.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:00 am
” https://blog.volkovlaw.com/2019/08/board-members-should-take-note-delaware-supreme-court-issues-important-decision-on-caremark-compliance-standard/ Diversified Portfolios Do Not Reduce Competitionby Barbara Novick, BlackRock, Inc. [read post]
