Search for: "O'Connor v. Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
Back in July 2005, I posted to our "Supreme Court Nominations" subsite (now defunct) a list of precedents that were the most vulnerable in the wake of Justice O';Connor's retirement. [read post]
30 Mar 2005, 10:20 am
Read the court's majority opinion [PDF text], per Justice Stevens, along with Justice O';Connor's [read post]
31 May 2006, 6:06 am
Smith v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
SMITH AND BRUCE M. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am
Speaking of the first Monday in October, the revived New Rambler has just posted my review of the new biographies of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 2:08 pm
Thompson), Justice O';Connor's opinion for the majority began with what are now familiar, if still chilling, words to capital litigators.This is a case about federalism. [read post]
9 May 2014, 11:22 pm
Kennedy's opinion was joined by O'Connor, Lanzinger, O'Donnell, and French. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:26 am
The dissenters were the arch-liberal Justices Brennan and Marshall, Justice Blackmun, who by then was seen as a liberal, and Justice O'Connor, who was a moderate conservative. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:18 am
While thought-provoking, this is just wrong and doesn't give Justice O';Connor's view of abortion jurisprudence its due. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:53 am
[Footnote:] This brief also does not discuss the original meaning of the Free Exercise Clause, a matter treated in Justice Scalia's and Justice O';Connor's opinions in City of Boerne v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am
A perplexing and influential record on property and eminent domain: Justice O’Connor Justice O’Connor delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 2:52 pm
Wolfson who figures so prominently in Smith v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am
And while, under this interpretation, these early "free exercise" enactments support the Court's judgment in Smith, I see no sensible interpretation that could cause them to support what I understand to be the position of Justice O'Connor, or any of Smith's other critics. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:46 pm
But I agree that under the Supreme Court's 2003 decision in Smith v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 4:15 pm
Smith. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 6:24 am
Searches of his office computer hard drive and his departmentally issued equipment was within the opeational realities of the workplace under O'Connor v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 6:20 am
Bartnicki was a 6-3 decision, with Justice O'Connor in the majority (and joining a narrowing concurrence by Justice Breyer) and Chief Justice Rehnquist writing the dissent. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 2:37 am
In the USSC decision in Smith v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 12:01 am
Ron Rotunda offers his views on the "robo-calls" using a recording of Justice O'Connor. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 3:57 am
See Thornton, 541 U.S. at 624 (O'Connor, J., concurring in part); see also Evans v. [read post]
