Search for: "O'DONNELL v. KENNEDY"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2014, 10:04 am
In a 4-3 decision written by Justice O’Donnell, for himself and Justices Pfeifer, Kennedy and O’Neill, the Court held that a child’s statement to his teachers about physical abuse constitutes testimonial evidence barred by the Confrontation Clause when the child has been found incompetent to testify. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am
And Justice Kennedy did address this in her dissent in Aalim I in paragraphs 39 and 40. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm
In a 4-3 decision written by Justice Terrence O’Donnell, for himself and Justices Paul Pfeifer, Sharon Kennedy and Bill O’Neill, the court held that a child’s statement to his teachers about physical abuse constitutes testimonial evidence barred by the Confrontation Clause when the child has been found incompetent to testify. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 7:16 am
No: Justices O’Donnell and French. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:36 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices Fischer, French, Kennedy, and former Justice O’Donnell. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
No: Justices O’Donnell and French. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:02 am
” Justice O’Neill, to counsel for Medpace On February 8, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of McGowan v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 7:39 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices Pfeifer, O’Neill, Kennedy and French No: Chief Justice O’Connor, and Justices Lanzinger and O’Donnell Key Precedent R.C. 2711.10(D) (“In any of the following cases, the court of common pleas shall make an order vacating the award upon the application of any party to the arbitration if . . . [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:12 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices DeGenaro, DeWine, Fischer, French, Kennedy, and O’Donnell.* *Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices DeWine and O’Donnell dissent in part and would accept the case only as to proposition of law 1. [read post]
