Search for: "O’Connor Law"
Results 301 - 320
of 3,490
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
Professor Nick Couldry and Assistant Professor João Magalhães offer commentaries of Mansell’s work on the LSE Media Blog. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 8:30 am
Excellent news out of Oklahoma: In an official legal opinion, Oklahoma Attorney General John O’Connor says a state law that prohibits religious entities from operating a public charter school likely violates the First Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 8:37 am
Put the other way, the evidence establishes that University sufficiently attempts to moderate and sufficiently does moderate the comment threads to qualify its Instagram and Facebook pages as nonpublic fora… [Eric’s comment: Florida’s social media censorship law requires “consistent” content moderation. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 3:46 am
The Supreme Court ruled in the landmark 1975 case O’Connor v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 11:49 am
Josephine Bahn, an associate in Cozen O’Connor’s Commercial Litigation & Construction Law practices, was installed as national chair of the American Bar Association Young Lawyers Division. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
(Here I distinguish the preservative conservativism of Justices Harlan, the early Blackmun, Powell, O’Connor, Kennedy, and Souter from the counter-revolutionary or movement conservatism of Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito.) [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
The Greenhouse effect was after all, based on the hypothesis that the likes of Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony Kennedy cared what Linda Greenhouse wrote about them in The New York Times.Both sentiments expressed by Justice Thomas were well justified and have proven true over time. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 7:24 am
At the conference’s opening meeting, Dan Bailey, one of the absolute titans of the D&O industry, was awarded the PLUS1 award. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 6:15 am
"—Bijal Shah, Associate Professor of Law, Arizona State University, Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law "Shane has puzzled over the parameters of presidential power for decades—as scholar, policy practitioner, and concerned citizen. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In this episode, host Craig Williams joins guest Rhett Larson, the Richard Morrison Professor of Water Law at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, as we spotlight water law. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor there opined that, “25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today. [read post]
5 Nov 2022, 1:59 pm
Bakke; Sandra Day O’Connor wrote for the majority in 2003’s Grutter v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:17 am
The High Court in Northern Ireland promptly disagreed (O’Connor v Greece [2017] NIQB 77) and the matter came before the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
The majority opinion of Justice O’Connor noted how much the definition of “family” had evolved in the 20th century and that all 50 states had enacted some form of grandparent custody law. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:44 pm
But Chief Justice John Roberts pushed back, observing that Prelogar’s argument “was very different from what Justice O’Connor said” in Grutter. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:27 pm
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote in Grutter, “We expect that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest [in educational diversity] approved today. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
While Justice O’Connor did not believe the use of racial preferences would be necessary past 2028, universities clearly do not agree. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 4:00 pm
Most famously (or infamously), Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s landmark 2003 opinion in Grutter v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 2:15 pm
O’Connor and then-Solicitor General Mithun Mansinghani, led a 19-state amicus brief in support of Students for Fair Admissions. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 9:20 am
If so, we will not need to wait until Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s 25-year expiration date for affirmative action — announced in Grutter — “to see [the 14th Amendment’s] principle of equality vindicated. [read post]
