Search for: "O.S. V. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
Since state and local laws prohibit employment related discrimination based on an individual’s sex, the AD2 thought O.S. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 5:30 am
Like Federal Rule of Evidence 803(5), 12 O.S.2001 Section 2803(5) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for: A record concerning a matter about which a witness once had knowledge but now has insufficient recollection to testify fully and... [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 9:37 am
Expert Testimony 12 O.S. 2702, 2703 The legislation essentially incorporates Federal Rule 702 and 703 which adds language from Daubert v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 10:28 am
Sims relied on 12 O.S. 832(H) which states: H. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
Co., v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:15 am
” When parent(s) submit a joint custody plan, the parent(s) submitting the plan must also sign an affidavit stating that they will abide by the plan. 43 O.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:15 am
” When parent(s) submit a joint custody plan, the parent(s) submitting the plan must also sign an affidavit stating that they will abide by the plan. 43 O.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 5:14 am
” or “O.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:53 pm
” or “O.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 4:03 am
McMinn v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 6:22 am
State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
Atkinson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:09 am
" and it will appear in the print version of JECLAP at (2015) 6 (2): 96-97.The case in question is Case C-351/12 OSA – Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně a.s., 27 February 2014 and Eleonora's abstract reads as follows:Even where national law reserves collective management of rights to a certain collecting society, this… [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 6:00 am
Conti v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 4:13 am
G.M. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:41 am
Bd. of Regents v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 9:58 am
In Zaloudek Grain Company v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 7:24 am
In ,Catlin v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:03 am
Oklahoma State Penitentiary, 1990 OK 47, ¶15, 792 P.2d 60.Considering the clear pronouncement of Burns that the phrase “purely personal risk” effectively overruled Fox v. [read post]
