Search for: "OCEAN SIDE, LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 95
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2019, 4:10 am by Peter Mahler
Case law development has been slow, as evidenced by the 16 years it took before an appellate court in the 1545 Ocean Avenue case construed the standard for judicial dissolution of LLCs under Section 702. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 12:19 pm by Richard Hunt
Oceanic Arcata, LP, 2019 WL 1559562 (N.D. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 12:31 pm by Patricia Salkin
Petitioner owned a 43.5-acre parcel in the agricultural overlay district in Village of Sagaponack that faced the ocean on its southern side and fronted on a public highway to the north. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:49 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Driscoll’s ruling concludes with invitations to both sides. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 2:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
Fair use is a tricky issue, and often a thorn on the side of copyright owners. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
Defendant on Both Sides of Cash-Out Merger Fails to Win Dismissal of Minority Shareholder Suit Alleging Inadequate Consideration  RAL Capital Ltd. v CheckM8, Inc., 2017 NY Slip Op 32000(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept. 21, 2017]. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 6:37 am by Benjamin F. Jackson, Stephen P. Younger
”[5]  The Second Department then explained that based on Matter of Dissolution of 1545 Ocean Avenue, LLC,[6] an LLC member seeking judicial dissolution of the LLC must demonstrate that either: (1) the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to promote the LLC’s stated purpose, or (2) continuing the entity is financially unfeasible. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
 The latter ground, she observed in a footnote, is inapplicable as both sides agreed the company is profitable. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
 The latter ground, she observed in a footnote, is inapplicable as both sides agreed the company is profitable. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
 The latter ground, she observed in a footnote, is inapplicable as both sides agreed the company is profitable. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]