Search for: "OFFICER PAULK"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm
Paulk, 566 U.S. 356, 363 (2012) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Tower, supra, at 922–923 (“We do not have a license to establish immunities from” suits brought under the Act “in the interests of what we judge to be sound public policy”). [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 12:32 pm
I see cases like this every day in my office. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 12:32 pm
I see cases like this every day in my office. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:18 pm
An officer conducted a traffic stop after observing Paulk’s vehicle allegedly driving too close to emergency vehicles parked on the side of the road. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:36 pm
The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office said 28-year-old Marcus Paulk is also suspected of possessing marijuana and drug paraphernalia. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 3:46 pm
Paulk in 2012. [read post]
30 May 2014, 10:28 am
I am sure that once the charges against Morales were dropped that he went to a lawyer's office hoping to file a lawsuit. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:00 pm
Paulk, 132 S.Ct. 1497 (2012), during the 19th century “it was common for criminal cases to be prosecuted by private parties. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 8:15 am
By Meghan Paulk Ingle A Texas-registered trademark can protect your company’s name, logo or slogan from use by another business in Texas. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:50 am
Paulk additionally held that there is no difference between a law enforcement officer and a civilian witness for purposes of this immunity. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
Paulk (9-0): A witness in a grand jury proceeding is entitled to absolute immunity from a §1983 suit; this protection had already been extended to a witness at trial. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:35 am
In addition to overreaching the people whom they are to serve, three officers wasted one-half day watching four others embarrass themselves. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:41 am
Charles Rehberg sued James Paulk under Section1983, alleging that Paulk, a law enforcement officer, had committed perjury at various grand jury proceedings which had led to Rehberg being indicted several times, only to have the criminal prosecutions subsequently dismissed. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 1:06 am
Paulk, an investigator for the Albany Georgia District Attorney's office testified three times before a grand jury. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:06 am
Petitioner Rehberg was indicted three separate times for aggravated assault, battery and making harassing phone calls, largely based upon the testimony of respondent Paulk, the chief investigator of the Albany, Georgia, district attorney's office. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:49 pm
Paulk. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:26 am
Rehberg filed a federal complaint alleging that Paulk, an investigator for the District Attorney’s Office, had knowingly provided false testimony against him in multiple grand jury proceedings, which led to three indictments, all of which were subsequently dismissed. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:47 am
Thus, complaining witnesses were private citizens, not law enforcement officers such as Paulk. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:01 pm
Paulk (docket 10-788). [read post]
