Search for: "ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT ON LAWYER REGISTRATION." Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Dawn Zoldi
On the constitutional front, citing the Supreme Court case U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
  The Judge ruled, "In accordance with Rule 57 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Declaratory Judgment shall be entered separately, declaring FLA.STAT. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 12:51 am by Supreme People's Court Monitor
It is likely that these cases will provide background material for a more comprehensive judicial interpretation of the Administrative Procedure (Litigation) Law than the one issued shortly after the amended law was promulgated. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 3:47 pm
In order to classify the defendant a "Sex Offender Registration Act Risk Assessment Instrument" promulgated by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders pursuant to Correction Law section 168-l is utilized. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:56 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In order to classify the defendant a "Sex Offender Registration Act Risk Assessment Instrument" promulgated by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders pursuant to Correction Law section 168-l is utilized. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
We continue to monitor the emergence of a potential circuit split regarding whether the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Lorenzo allows scheme liability under Rule 10b-5(a) and (c) without alleging dissemination and based solely on the same conduct as Rule 10b-5(b) misrepresentation claims. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 3:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Unchanged since its enactment in 1933, with no rules or regulations ever promulgated thereunder, the SEC started out charging Section 17(b) to combat touting fraud in a variety of mediums, including brochures, newsletters, and radio talk shows – wherever touters attempted to disguise their paid promotions as independent, objective analysis. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
This paper seeks to make a case for the changing of the design of BITs allowing for host state claims to which India is a party, accompanied with relevant amendments to the Act in order to align it with the rigors of investment treaty arbitration. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 3:00 am
At the highest level, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress is superior to the Supreme People’s Court: it has the final word when it comes to the interpretation[40] or invalidating[41] of laws by the Supreme People’s Court. [read post]