Search for: "OXLEY v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
United States, a Sarbanes-Oxley anti-shredding case. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:05 am
The case, Lawson v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 11:12 am
The court in Tides v The Boeing Co., --- F.4th ---- (9th Cir. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:10 am
The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to rule on the constitutionality of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act passed in 2002 to create a new government agency to regulate firms that audit the books of publicly traded companies. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:00 pm
The case is Yates v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:00 am
Lynch, that an employee does not have to allege that he “definitively and specifically” reported a known legal violation in order to state a Sarbanes-Oxley claim. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 7:52 pm
United States. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
” The Ruling In the memorandum and order, the judge denied Fidelity’s motions to dismiss the Sarbanes-Oxley claims, but granted the motions to dismiss the state law wrongful discharge claims. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
In Lawson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 2:06 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am
Affirming dismissal in Vodopia v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:53 am
Also influencing OSHA’s decision is the Supreme Court’s ruling in Kasten v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:00 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion, in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 4:00 am
All rights reserved.In Tice v Bristol-Myers Squibb, No. 07-3977, the U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Lawson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:08 pm
In Guyden v. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 7:54 am
The manner in which Sarbanes-Oxley relates to state law, particularly the doctrine of at-will employment, is discussed in Part III. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
United States, SCOTUS Blog (Nov. 14, 2014), http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/yates-v-united-states/. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:06 am
In Lawson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 11:21 am
In its May 28th, 2015 decision in Rhinehimer v. [read post]
