Search for: "Oakley v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2016, 12:41 pm
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Separate sentences for pandering and contributing to delinquency of minor A jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County convicted Abudallah Hannibal Oakley, Appellant, of human trafficking (or “pandering”) and contributing to the conditions of a minor (hereinafter “contributing”). [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 9:47 am
A settlement in the the lawsuit titled Oakley et al. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:50 pm
In his forthcoming article, "Child Welfare and Future Persons", Carter Dillard, Westerfield Fellow, at Loyola University, New Orleans takes on the questions raised by State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 6:39 am
Fergon Architects LLC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:29 pm
Summary of Decision issued July 30, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Oakley, Fremont County Assessor v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:57 pm
Case date: 07 August 2019 Case number:No. 18-10157 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 10:54 am
Facts: This case (Hutchens et al v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 2:42 pm
Moje v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 7:35 am
Turner v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 7:35 am
Turner v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am
Second, although Lord Carnwath favoured effective supervision as the general rationale for a common law obligation to give reasons, the obligation could be justified in the present case (as in Oakley v South Cambridgeshire District Council [2017] 2 P & CR 4, [2017] EWCA Civ 71: see Mark Elliott’s post) on the basis that “openness and fairness to objectors required the members’ reasons to be stated” (at para 57,… [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 5:24 am
Judgment in full Appearances For the plaintiff: Matthew Lewis instructed by Mills Oakley. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:45 pm
Oakley, 618 F.2d 1351, 1356 (9th Cir. 1980);DiGaetano v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:05 am
Oakley Sales Corp., No. 13-55891. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 6:55 am
Oakley. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 11:14 am
., S.P.A. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
Oakley, 28 NY2d 309, 314; People v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:14 pm
Sakkab v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 1:07 pm
See Oakley v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:36 am
Furthermore, while the trial court clearly erred in instructing the jury on state of mind, the error did not “seriously impair” the integrity of the proceedings (U.S. v. [read post]
