Search for: "Ochs v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2018, 7:11 am
Post-Och Telestyrelsen and Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 5:56 am
Download Ochs v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:51 am
Yesterday's Supreme Court decision in Damache v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
That stance is at odds with the US Supreme Court decision in United States v Jones (January 23, 2012), about which I posted yesterday. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 5:09 pm
In the recent case of Jeffery v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 4:35 am
Anyway, the case in question was Och-Ziff Management Europe Ltd & Anor v Och Capital LLP & Anor [2010] EWHC 2599 (Ch). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
The investigating body sent a confidential Letter of Request to a foreign state seeking information and documents relating to him. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:29 am
The term derives from US trademark case law, although as noted in a recent decision in the High Court of Justice, Chancery Division (citing cases from most of the Circuit Courts of Appeal) , OCH-Ziff Management Europe Limited v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
And Article 24 required Member States for provide for sanctions for breach of implementing legislation. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm
Sinn Féin TD sues An Garda Síochána, Independent titles publisher and State (Colm Keena, Irish Times, 24 September 2023) Martin Kenny is taking breach of privacy case arising from news report that did not name him or his party. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
For example, as Finlay CJ put it in Conway v INTO [1991] 2 IR 305, 317 “in respect of damages in tort … ordinary compensatory damages … [are] sums calculated to recompense a wronged plaintiff for physical injury, mental distress,anxiety, deprivation of convenience, or other harmful effects of a wrongful act and/or for monies lost or to be lost and/or expenses incurred or to be incurred by reason of the commission of the wrongful act” (emphasis added; see also… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:44 am
Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 centred on the constitutionality of s.29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, as amended by s.5 of the Criminal Law Act 1976. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:37 pm
Cir. 1994) (citing United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:25 pm
Heller in which he wrote the majority opinion and Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
Section 5 is a computer-specific offence and deals with persons who, without lawful excuse, operate a computer within the State with intent to access any data kept either within or outside the State, or outside the State with intent to access any data kept within the State, whether or not any data is actually accessed. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
As Noonan J in the High Court succinctly summarized Collins in Duggan v Commissioner of an Garda Síochána [2017] IEHC 565 (06 October 2017) [8], a breach of section 7 DPA88 “is not actionable per se but only on proof of actual damage”. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:40 am
… I expressly refrained from expressing any view on it in Och-Ziff, since it did not arise in that case. [read post]
