Search for: "Ochs v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2017, 7:00 am
Have there been any problems in connection with the “cashless” state? [read post]
22 May 2017, 12:00 pm
Post- och telestyrelsen and Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:52 pm
More recently, we have received the Opinion of the Advocate General (AG) of the CJEU (in Tele2 Sverige AB v Post- och telestyrelsen and Secretary of State for the Home Department v Tom Watson and Others, Joined Cases C-203/15 and C-698/15, 19 July 2016). [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:25 pm
Heller in which he wrote the majority opinion and Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 12:00 pm
The state compensates the municipality for the additional costs. 4. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
V. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
For example, as Finlay CJ put it in Conway v INTO [1991] 2 IR 305, 317 “in respect of damages in tort … ordinary compensatory damages … [are] sums calculated to recompense a wronged plaintiff for physical injury, mental distress,anxiety, deprivation of convenience, or other harmful effects of a wrongful act and/or for monies lost or to be lost and/or expenses incurred or to be incurred by reason of the commission of the wrongful act” (emphasis added; see also… [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) On April 8, 2014, the European Court of Justice, sitting as the Grand Chamber, delivered its decision in Digital Rights Ireland Ltd (C‑293/12) v Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Commissioner of the Garda Síochána, Ireland, The Attorney General. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 5:09 pm
In the recent case of Jeffery v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:37 pm
Cir. 1994) (citing United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
Section 5 is a computer-specific offence and deals with persons who, without lawful excuse, operate a computer within the State with intent to access any data kept either within or outside the State, or outside the State with intent to access any data kept within the State, whether or not any data is actually accessed. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am
, stated that … cases that might be affected by the terms of the judgement will be the subject of examination by the Director of Public Prosecutions and the Garda Síochána in order to decide how to proceed. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:37 pm
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:44 am
Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 centred on the constitutionality of s.29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, as amended by s.5 of the Criminal Law Act 1976. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:51 am
Yesterday's Supreme Court decision in Damache v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
That stance is at odds with the US Supreme Court decision in United States v Jones (January 23, 2012), about which I posted yesterday. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:42 am
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:33 pm
The recent decision of the US Supreme Court in United States v Jones has brought one particular form of surveillance of suspected individuals to the fore in public debate, namely the use of global positioning surveillance (GPS). [read post]
