Search for: "Odell v. Public Service Company"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Sunlight is the best disinfectant: open justice and company law proceedings in Ireland – Eoin O’Dell
25 May 2012, 5:23 pm
Similarly, in the absence of statutory authority or constitutional requirement, the Courts cannot permit a party to conduct litigation anonymously (Roe v The Blood Transfusion Service Board [1996] 3 IR 67 (Laffoy J); Re Ansbacher (Cayman) Limited [2002] 2 IR 517, [2002] IEHC 27 (24 April 2002); Doe v The Revenue Commissioners [2008] 3 IR 328, [2008] 2 ILRM 114, [2008] IEHC 5 (18 January 2008); McKeogh v Doe [2012] IEHC 95 (26 Jan 2012)). [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 12:45 am
Waldorf (l) and Statler (r) In Smeaton v Equifax plc [2013] EWCA Civ 108 (20 February 2013), the defendant, Equifax, had registered the plaintiff’s bankruptcy on their credit reference service, but had not registered that it had been discharged. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:41 am
David Richards J held that this would therefore have involved a significant departures from two fundamental common law principles: first, the principle of open justice requires that trials are conducted in public; and, second, the principle of natural justice includes the right of a party to know the case against him and the evidence on which it is based (relying on Al Rawi v The Security Service [2011] UKSC 34 (13 July 2011) [10]-[13] (Lord Dyson); and later, in respect… [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:01 am
Emmerich, and Sabastian V. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
Odell Anders v. [read post]
