Search for: "Office Design Group v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 2,037
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
DGL Group, Ltd., the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey recently denied a defendant’s motion to amend its invalidity contentions to include an additional written description argument. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:52 am by Lyle Denniston
Phillips of the Washington office of  Sidley Austin. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:39 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 7:24 am by Tom
Humanitarian Law Project, Nos. 08-1498, 09-89 (whether the statutory ban against providing material support to a group designated by the government as “terrorist” is unconstitutionally vague). [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am by Ed Stein
” The President did not provide much detail regarding why, as the EO concluded, “these actions constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The measure was similar to the Home Office prohibition on persons subject to immigration control marrying without the Secretary of State’s written permission, which was found to be unlawful in R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 . [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 8:46 am by Quinta Jurecic
  Iran has been designated as a state sponsor of terrorism since 1984 and continues to support various terrorist groups, including Hizballah, Hamas, and terrorist groups in Iraq. [read post]
  On Thursday, Februrary 8, I sat in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States on assignment for JURIST to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:05 am by William S. Dodge
On Monday, the Supreme Court called for the views of the Solicitor General in NSO Group Technologies Ltd. v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 4:24 am
Wallace, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Special Agent.U.S. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 2:26 pm by Jon L. Gelman
The defendants invite us to assert the "judicial Power of the United States" over a matter that belongs to the states. [read post]