Search for: "Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grant " Results 1 - 20 of 345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2012, 7:30 am
Right to counsel in an administrative disciplinary hearing Matter of Elmore v Plainview-Old Bethpage Central School District, Board of Education, 273 A.D.2d 307 The Plainview-Old Bethpage Central School District terminated the employee following an administrative disciplinary hearing held pursuant to Education Law §3020-a. [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:57 pm by Jamie Markham
The federal district judge granted the officers’ motion for summary judgment. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
Arbitrator’s disciplinary decision must be sustained by the court if there is a rational basis for, and sufficient evidence to support, the determinationMatter of Matter of Trupiano v Board of Educ. of E. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:31 am
Representation by a layperson in an administrative disciplinary proceeding Sam v Metro-North Commuter Railroad, App. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:07 am
In another Section 3020-a disciplinary action that involved considering public policy with respect to the penalty imposed, the Appellate Division, Second Department, found that a disciplinary penalty consisting of counseling, remediation, and a 60-day suspension, violated a strong public policy. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Court denies educator's motion to rescind a settlement agreement resolving a disciplinary action because the educator had a change of mindNobile v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Court denies educator's motion to rescind a settlement agreement resolving a disciplinary action because the educator had a change of mindNobile v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am by Public Employment Law Press
The arbitrator granted counsel's request to be relieved but did not grant counsel's request for an adjournment, and allowed the RCSD to proceed with the hearing on that date and elicit testimonial evidence from two witnesses without the presence of Ventillo or counsel. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am by Public Employment Law Press
The arbitrator granted counsel's request to be relieved but did not grant counsel's request for an adjournment, and allowed the RCSD to proceed with the hearing on that date and elicit testimonial evidence from two witnesses without the presence of Ventillo or counsel. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am by Public Employment Law Press
The arbitrator granted counsel's request to be relieved but did not grant counsel's request for an adjournment, and allowed the RCSD to proceed with the hearing on that date and elicit testimonial evidence from two witnesses without the presence of Ventillo or counsel. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am by Public Employment Law Press
The arbitrator granted counsel's request to be relieved but did not grant counsel's request for an adjournment, and allowed the RCSD to proceed with the hearing on that date and elicit testimonial evidence from two witnesses without the presence of Ventillo or counsel. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 3:00 am by Broc Romanek
Office of Disciplinary Counsel, 471 U.S. 626 (1985), and American Meat Institute v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
SED then moved to apply the findings of fact made by the Hearing Office in the disciplinary hearing in the decertification hearing under color of the doctrine of collateral estoppel.The Hearing Officer in the SED proceeding granted SED's motion subject to the qualification, among others, that collateral estoppel would not apply if Principal lacked "competent counsel" at the disciplinary hearing. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
SED then moved to apply the findings of fact made by the Hearing Office in the disciplinary hearing in the decertification hearing under color of the doctrine of collateral estoppel.The Hearing Officer in the SED proceeding granted SED's motion subject to the qualification, among others, that collateral estoppel would not apply if Principal lacked "competent counsel" at the disciplinary hearing. [read post]