Search for: "Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grant "
Results 1 - 20
of 345
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2012, 7:30 am
Right to counsel in an administrative disciplinary hearing Matter of Elmore v Plainview-Old Bethpage Central School District, Board of Education, 273 A.D.2d 307 The Plainview-Old Bethpage Central School District terminated the employee following an administrative disciplinary hearing held pursuant to Education Law §3020-a. [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:57 pm
The federal district judge granted the officers’ motion for summary judgment. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
Arbitrator’s disciplinary decision must be sustained by the court if there is a rational basis for, and sufficient evidence to support, the determinationMatter of Matter of Trupiano v Board of Educ. of E. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:45 pm
Law Office of John A. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:45 pm
Law Office of John A. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:31 am
Representation by a layperson in an administrative disciplinary proceeding Sam v Metro-North Commuter Railroad, App. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:07 am
In another Section 3020-a disciplinary action that involved considering public policy with respect to the penalty imposed, the Appellate Division, Second Department, found that a disciplinary penalty consisting of counseling, remediation, and a 60-day suspension, violated a strong public policy. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Borrill, Corporation Counsel, Utica (Joseph V. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Borrill, Corporation Counsel, Utica (Joseph V. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:15 pm
All other charges shall be heard by a single hearing officer. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Court denies educator's motion to rescind a settlement agreement resolving a disciplinary action because the educator had a change of mindNobile v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Court denies educator's motion to rescind a settlement agreement resolving a disciplinary action because the educator had a change of mindNobile v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
The arbitrator granted counsel's request to be relieved but did not grant counsel's request for an adjournment, and allowed the RCSD to proceed with the hearing on that date and elicit testimonial evidence from two witnesses without the presence of Ventillo or counsel. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
The arbitrator granted counsel's request to be relieved but did not grant counsel's request for an adjournment, and allowed the RCSD to proceed with the hearing on that date and elicit testimonial evidence from two witnesses without the presence of Ventillo or counsel. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
The arbitrator granted counsel's request to be relieved but did not grant counsel's request for an adjournment, and allowed the RCSD to proceed with the hearing on that date and elicit testimonial evidence from two witnesses without the presence of Ventillo or counsel. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
The arbitrator granted counsel's request to be relieved but did not grant counsel's request for an adjournment, and allowed the RCSD to proceed with the hearing on that date and elicit testimonial evidence from two witnesses without the presence of Ventillo or counsel. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 3:00 am
Office of Disciplinary Counsel, 471 U.S. 626 (1985), and American Meat Institute v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:32 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:30 am
SED then moved to apply the findings of fact made by the Hearing Office in the disciplinary hearing in the decertification hearing under color of the doctrine of collateral estoppel.The Hearing Officer in the SED proceeding granted SED's motion subject to the qualification, among others, that collateral estoppel would not apply if Principal lacked "competent counsel" at the disciplinary hearing. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:30 am
SED then moved to apply the findings of fact made by the Hearing Office in the disciplinary hearing in the decertification hearing under color of the doctrine of collateral estoppel.The Hearing Officer in the SED proceeding granted SED's motion subject to the qualification, among others, that collateral estoppel would not apply if Principal lacked "competent counsel" at the disciplinary hearing. [read post]