Search for: "Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith "
Results 21 - 40
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
In response to questioning by petitioner’s counsel, respondent agreed that a rifle or a shotgun is a firearm (Tr. 162, 167-68). [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:41 am
Smith, of counsel), for petitioner. [read post]
18 Mar 2006, 6:09 am
Sulz v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
[Counsel for IB]: It didn't come up in testimony. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
’ Smith v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:31 am
From June Medical Services, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:31 am
From June Medical Services, LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Crown counsel admitted the officer “did a horrible job on the stand. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 10:37 am
Smith v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Smith was disbarred, as recommended by the hearing officer. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 2:18 am
Citing Holt v Board of Educ. of Webutuck Cent. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:33 am
And last week in Harris v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:56 am
§§ 10.20 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:16 am
Smith turned and ran, and was tackled and handcuffed by the officer. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:00 am
” Pegler v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:00 am
” Pegler v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm
No. 403 v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
Rohl, Ray Smith, and L. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:39 pm
LEXIS 18970 (5th Cir 9/9/2010) (dissent) Relief denied, on materiality grounds, relating to a Brady claim where one “of the officers who had testified at his trial, Jaime Escalante, had a disciplinary record and was romantically involved with the sister of the lone eyewitness, Reynaldo Munoz. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 2:29 pm
See Texas Disciplinary R. [read post]
