Search for: "Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith "
Results 21 - 40
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2020, 6:27 pm
Regardless, Justice Smith sought judicial review before the Federal Court in Smith v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
Article 37 of the UCMJ prohibits such commanders from using their rank and position to unduly influence the course of the trial, the witnesses or the accused, the judge or panel members, and the prosecutor and defense counsel. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Carl Coleman, Seton Hall University School of Law, Ethical Issues in Managing Vector-Borne Diseases Stacie Kershner, Georgia State University College of Law, Public Health Law and the E-Scooter Epidemic Noah Smith-Drelich, Columbia Law School, Food Tax Substitution Effects B. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:13 am
There will be a discussion after Smith’s presentation moderated by Darrell West. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Court denies educator's motion to rescind a settlement agreement resolving a disciplinary action because the educator had a change of mindNobile v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Court denies educator's motion to rescind a settlement agreement resolving a disciplinary action because the educator had a change of mindNobile v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
Arguing Counsel Anthony T. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 11:28 am
Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio that limited factual disclosures serve the state’s interest in protecting the public from misleading and deceptive commercial speech. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
[Counsel for IB]: It didn't come up in testimony. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
I am generally available to talk with you during office hours on Mondays and Wednesdays, or, otherwise, by appointment. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
’ Smith v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:57 pm
By 5:05 p.m., an officer had filed a disciplinary report and ordered a sanction of 45 days in disciplinary segregation. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 2:29 pm
See Texas Disciplinary R. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:50 am
" The Court cites Smith v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 12:02 pm
Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
A few days ago, the California attorney general’s office submitted its opposition, and we in turn submitted our reply. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:23 am
Andrew Moore, Kevin Amer, Regan Smith, Jason Sloan 40,000 written comments. [read post]
