Search for: "Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith "
Results 61 - 80
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
” No, according to the Court of Appeal's ruling in Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:52 am
Anatomy of a hearing officer's disciplinary findings and recommendationAverill Park CSD v Craig Landin, Decision of Hearing Officer Howard A. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
will be decided this week, this time by the European Patent Office in Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company [2010] EWCA Civ 33. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
A claim of double jeopardy is sometimes encountered in efforts to suppress a disciplinary action in situations were the charges reflect the same acts or omissions that were the subject of counseling memoranda or performance evaluations.The courts have rejected this theory.** In Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98, the Court of Appeals said that including charges concerning performance that were addressed in a counseling memorandum was not “double… [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:33 am
And last week in Harris v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:55 pm
Smith, Judge Schack denied the mortgagee’s motion for a judgment of foreclosure that the Baum firm had brought on the ground that they failed to provide an affidavit of facts executed by an officer of the mortgagee who had knowledge of the facts. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 6:35 pm
In re Billy James Smith, 2011 Tex. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:16 am
Smith turned and ran, and was tackled and handcuffed by the officer. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Smith was disbarred, as recommended by the hearing officer. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:05 am
In the meanwhile, Kearney moved for leave to withdraw as counsel for Smith in the federal court action and described why he wished to so withdraw -- the threats Smith allegedly made against Tillem. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:45 am
In Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98 the Court of Appeals said that including charges concerning performance that were addressed in a counseling memorandum was not “double jeopardy. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
NanceDocket: 09-1115Issue(s): (1) Whether a police officer may be held liable on a claim under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:39 pm
LEXIS 18970 (5th Cir 9/9/2010) (dissent) Relief denied, on materiality grounds, relating to a Brady claim where one “of the officers who had testified at his trial, Jaime Escalante, had a disciplinary record and was romantically involved with the sister of the lone eyewitness, Reynaldo Munoz. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 12:31 am
This approach was on display during the dense and complex arguments in Samantar v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:29 am
After the Supreme Court’s decision two months ago in Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:42 am
The only significant decision out of Washington last week was Smith v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
The solicitor was acting for an officer of the Department in connection with a potential invalidity retirement. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 10:17 am
") AC29387 - Smith v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
Smith v. [read post]
