Search for: "Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Patrick Michael Cooper"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm
Cooper Technologies Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm
On 17 May 2018, the Court of Appeal (Gross, Macfarlane and Coulson LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of TLT v Home Office. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:49 am
Michael M. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm
Cotton and Hudson senior fellow Michael Doran, will focus on how this Act would discourage foreign states from taking Americans hostage and incentivize the release of those already detained. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
: (Patent Baristas), Canada: Generic drug manufacturers urge Parliament to forfeit idea of new regulations delaying their ability to reproduce drugs: (Spicy IP), India: Indian generics and health activists having problem over patent titles: (Patent Circle), Europe: EPO to determine in June the fate of WARF stem cell patent application: (IPBiz), India: Choking the patients??? [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
-Australia security cooperation with keynote remarks offered by Australian Minister for Defense Linda Reynolds followed by a conversation with Hudson’s Asia-Pacific Security Chair Patrick Cronin. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty) Ltd:… [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
Bradley Cooper who pushed the button? [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court precedent the motion relied on for claiming “absolute immunity” from criminal prosecution, his lawyers acknowledged, did not address criminal prosecutions. [read post]
