Search for: "Ohio Bell Telephone Company The" Results 21 - 31 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2007, 1:05 am
Former AG Bell: Politics Has No Place at the DOJ Fulton County Daily Report Griffin Bell declined to wade directly into the bubbling controversy over the dismissal of eight U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:05 am
Former AG Bell: Politics Has No Place at the DOJ Fulton County Daily Report Griffin Bell declined to wade directly into the bubbling controversy over the dismissal of eight U.S. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm by News Desk
An agreement between Blue Bell and the Texas State Department of Health Services requires the company to pay $175,000 within 30 days of the signing of the agreement. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
  Converting a company’s marketing into a special undertaking to inform the public about the known risks of its products would subject every manufacturer that advertises its products to liability for a “special duty” created by such marketing, and that duty would be violated by every material omission in such advertising. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 10:00 pm by Kurt R. Karst
However, Judge Newman distinguished Michigan Bell from the present case because the Michigan law, which compelled participation by the plaintiff telephone companies, denied them of their right to a “fair and reasonable rate of return. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 9:20 pm
  If a jury was going to decide the case, it had to decide the whole thing.The third case, Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Carlson arranged for the deposit and a subsequent wire transfer to the Otua Auto Company account at the Taipei Fubon Bank in Hong Kong. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
The Bell System's monopoly on what could be connected to telephones had been broken, so the heavy hand of its contracts was as absent as the FCC. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
The first edition of “Petitions to Watch” for the October 2008 term features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ opening conference of September 29. [read post]