Search for: "Ohio v. Thomas" Results 121 - 140 of 1,065
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2022, 12:18 pm by Ellena Erskine
”  The committee’s ranking Republican, Jim Jordan of Ohio, meanwhile, said Democrats’ calls for court reform were “intimidation” and falsely claimed that no Democrat has condemned the leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s draft opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 6:15 pm by Mridula Raman
Share“John the Tiger Man,” a hypothetical dangerous prisoner invented by Justice Stephen Breyer, featured prominently in Tuesday’s oral argument in Shoop v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 12:27 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  If you oppose slavery (and Dred Scott), you should oppose Roe v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 11:39 am by Samuel Bray
Ct. 2392, 2424–29 (2018) (Thomas J., concurring); Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Harlan’s moral vision is memorialized in his lone dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:41 pm by Maribeth Meluch
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio ruled that time spent in line to undergo a security screening after clocking out was a postliminary activity covered under the Portal-to-Portal Act and therefore such time was not compensable as overtime (Thomas v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
On the heels of former Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas’s indictment and suspension from the city council, the Board of Supervisors voted to conduct the audit to ensure transparency in the county’s contracting procedures, which came into question following Ridley-Thomas’s indictment on federal bribery and conspiracy charges. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:08 pm
On the contrary, it speaks approvingly of “Crawford’s emphatic rejection of the reliability-based approach of Ohio v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 2:25 pm by Jennifer Papapanagiotou
Texas On January 18, 2022, the State of Texas filed a motion to dismiss its claims in Texas v. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 6:03 pm by Mark Walsh
The court did so again in today’s cases: National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Some people are getting this priceless protection, and others are not, with little justification for the different treatment but just because they drew a judge who is more open to pseudonymity or because the judge found their plight to be specially sympathetic. [1] See Hundtofte v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 11:30 am by Mark Graber
Mississippi (1898) and Plessy v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am by Michael Stern
Thomas Eagleton, for example, submitted a lengthy joint statement in which they charged that OLC was “misinformed” as to congressional intent, whi [read post]