Search for: "Oldham v. Oldham"
Results 61 - 80
of 165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2015, 12:30 am
Their reasoning was based on an old case called R v Oldham MBC ex p Garlick and other appeals (1993) 25 HLR 319, in which the House of Lords had held that a person could only apply for assistance as homeless under (then) Pt.3, Housing Act 1985 (now, of course, Pt.7, Housing Act 1996), if he had capacity to understand an offer and reject or accept it. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 12:20 pm
It looked bleak for petitioner Baker Botts from the earliest moments of the argument yesterday in Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 4:46 pm
” Oldham v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 8:42 pm
Such is the case with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’s recent ruling in NetChoice v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:52 am
On the other side are cases like Rumsfeld v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:43 pm
UPI’s Michael Kirkland previews one of next Term’s cases, Fisher v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 2:16 pm
Just this situation arose in a case out of Albuquerque known as Oldham v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
This post will focus on Judge Oldham’s terrible majority opinion. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 11:25 pm
Oldham, 895 S.W.2d 352, 357 (Tex. 1995); Sax, 648 S.W.2d at 666. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 11:26 am
NetChoice and NetChoice v. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 2:40 pm
See Knick v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 8:50 am
She and the children are currently accommodated by Oldham Council under the Children Act 1989, s 17, and they receive subsistence and utilities support. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
However, if you can take into account their knowledge that something, such as the ox cart in Edward Young v Grierson Oldham, is commonly used descriptively, wouldn’t their knowledge that something was a trade mark be relevant also? [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 11:41 am
I'm still trying to fully digest the Netchoice v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 10:32 am
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:32 am
Here is the judgment of the two High Court judges in the Watkins v Woolas case. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 2:56 am
Laws banning truthful business speech about lawful conduct should trip First Amendment review [Ilya Shapiro on Cato amicus brief in Seeberger v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 1:17 pm
Deputy District Judge Oldham made a possession order. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 1:17 pm
Deputy District Judge Oldham made a possession order. [read post]
