Search for: "Oliver v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Even though Congress cannot forbid firearms in school zones under the Commerce Power (as the Court said it cannot in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 4:31 am by Amy Howe
At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen previews Direct Marketing Association v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 9:59 am
Marco Sassòli, The Convergence of the International Humanitarian Law of Non-International and International Armed Conflicts – The Dark Side of a Good Idea Urs Saxer, Staaten als Grundeinheiten des internationalen Systems Edzard Schmidt-Jortzig, Politik und Ethik Paul Seger, Let the Sunshine In: Five Small States on a Mission to a More Transparent United Nations Security Council Bruno Simma, »Ja, aber«: Der International Gerichtshof und das zwingende… [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 2:51 am by Scott Bomboy
On November 9, 1953, the United States Supreme Court upheld a prior, controversial decision that allowed major league baseball to operate outside of the Sherman Antitrust Act. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  The Women’s and Gender Studies Institute and The Centre for the Study of the United States in the Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy at the University of Toronto has posted a notice for a Postdoctoral Fellow. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 11:00 am by Dan Ernst
Yet baseball is the only professional sport--indeed the sole industry--in the United States that currently benefits from a judicially constructed antitrust immunity. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 7:56 pm by Benjamin Beaton
United States and “carefully interpreted” the bank fraud statute. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 12:04 am
-Britain treaty that aimed to protect birds that traveled between the United States and Canada (at the time, a British holding). [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
Oliver, 397 F.3d 369 (6th Cir. 2/2/05), was released the day before United States v. [read post]