Search for: "Olson v. Washington" Results 21 - 40 of 276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2011, 7:07 am by Ted Frank
Walter Olson reports on one such effort in Texas. [read post]
Editor’s Note: John Olson is a founding partner of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher's Washington, D.C. office and a visiting professor at the Georgetown Law Center. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 8:58 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
That would be Ted Olson, a man Washingtonians often refer to as a 'Washington super-lawyer.' Who is Ted Olson? [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm by Jon Levitan
Additional commentary comes from Walter Olson for Cato; Howard Wasserman for PrawfsBlawg; Jonathan H. [read post]
Editor’s Note: John Olson is a founding partner of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher's Washington, D.C. office and a visiting professor at the Georgetown Law Center. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Theodore Olson of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher in Washington will argue for the city. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
In his closing argument, Olson contended that Proposition 8 involved discrimination on the basis of gender and focused on the 1967 Supreme Court decision in Loving v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:25 am by Kali Borkoski
One year after the Court’s decision in Citizens United, David Bossie (president of Citizens United) and Theodore Olson (who argued the case for the group) have an op-ed in the Washington Post in which they contend that, “thanks to” the decision, we may celebrate that the First Amendment confirms what our forefathers fought for:  ‘the freedom to think for ourselves. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:55 am by Andrew Hamm
Circuit Historical Society will re-enact Morrison v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
I was in Washington earlier today to watch oral arguments in Ricci v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm by David Lat
Olson and special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 4:32 pm
In today's Washington Post, this editorial describes the Term as "simultaneously unsurprising and disappointing. [read post]