Search for: "Operating Engineers v. Jones" Results 21 - 40 of 131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
In part it was, as we say in the book, one of the Warren Court’s weapons against state criminal-justice systems that were engines of white supremacy or, at least, badly dysfunctional. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 24 September, The Guardian had a piece on the landmark ruling of the European Court of Justice which said that the “right to be forgotten” online does not extend beyond the borders of the European Union and arch engine operators faced no obligation to remove information outside the 28-country zone. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:08 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
Judge Thibodaux pointed to the fact that the Crown’s maintenance of a captain and crew, the constant maintenance of navigational tools and equipment, and the regular operation of the engines all pointed to the finding that it was capable of being used as a means of transportation. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am by Jack Sharman
Court of Appeal’s decision in September 2018 in Director of the Serious Fraud Office v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The matter at issue was whether the operation of section 32(4) of the Data Protection Act 1998, the implementation of a stay to proceedings, is consistent with Directive 95/46/EC or operates to compromise the freedom of expression and right to an effective remedy. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Mischon de Reya has a series of articles on GDPR compliance ranging from the volume of emails received by users, frequent questions and the implications for domain name owner search engine Whois. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO has posted guidance on the operation of Clause 12 of the Code – Discrimination. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
And AG Szpunar issued his opinion in The Pirate Bay case, advising the CJEU to answer the question posed by the Dutch Supreme Court of whether the Pirate Bay undertakes the act of communication to the public in the affirmative saying "the fact that the operator of a website makes it possible, by indexing them and providing a search engine, to find files containing works protected by copyright which are offered for sharing on a peer-to-peer network, constitutes a… [read post]