Search for: "Opinion of the Judges v Gould" Results 21 - 40 of 265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2014, 3:27 pm
 Total coincidence.Judge Reinhardt authors a unanimous, 34-page opinion telling us what everyone in the universe already knew full well: that the Ninth Circuit (and especially the panel of Judges Reinhardt, Gould and Berzon) was indeed striking down the same-sex marriage bans. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 5:31 am by Etta Lanum
  Ninth Circuit Judgment Circuit Judge Morgan Christen wrote the majority opinion, which Judge Marsha S. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 10:40 am
When I saw that it was a death penalty habeas case, and that Judge Berzon had written the opinion, I felt I had a reasonable guess as to how it might come out. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:07 pm
 Judges Graber and Gould write concurring opinions that express various points, both of which articulate a slightly different analysis than the majority opinion. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:44 am
Judge Gould writes a 22-page, single spaced opinion that can probably be summarized in a single -- telling -- paragraph. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 2:12 pm
 Not.)Judge McKeown's majority opinion holds that the right rule is that they're only "located" where their headquarters are. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm by Orin Kerr
In an opinion by Judge Cornelia Pillard, the D.C. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 1:59 pm
I have two related comments about this opinion by Judge Gould. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:12 pm
 Then concluding the publication order and amendment the same was Judge Gould does:  "No petitions for rehearing and/or rehearing en banc will be entertained." [read post]
Gould wrote the opinion of the court that affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Tingley’s claim. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 11:37 am
 Presumably someone watched it at some point.The other funny thing is that Judge Gould refers the reader to YouTube to watch the argument. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 1:19 pm
  Here are the two paragraphs in which Judge Gould describes how the case got to the Ninth Circuit:"In response to Castillo’s Motion for Class Certification, the district court found that Castillo had satisfied the requirements of commonality and typicality under FRCP 23(a)(2)–(3), but not predominance under FRCP 23(b)(3). [read post]