Search for: "Options for Senior America Corp. v. United States"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Q&A: Senior Fellows John F. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Excepted service agencies set their own qualification requirements; they are not subject to the appointment, pay, and classification rules of Title 5, United States Code. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Click Here United Parcel Service to Pay $53,931 Civil Penalty to Settle Alleged Violations of Waste Regulations at Lenexa, Kan. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:40 am
In Muransky v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
” [17] The enforcement unit of the Fina [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:14 pm
Similarly, in September 2015, KYB, a Japanese company, agreed to plead guilty for its role in a conspiracy to fix the prices of shock absorbers installed in cars and motorcycles sold in the United States. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
It also gives other states the option to adopt the California in-use non-road engine rules. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
(Please note that these filing figures represent federal court filings only; the figures do not include separate state court class action lawsuit filings.) [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
John Reed Stark Many of us have been following the continuing battle between Apple and the U.S. government on whether the government can required the company to unlock the iPhone of the San Bernardino terrorist, Syed Rizwan Farook, with a combination of confusion and concern. [read post]
