Search for: "Oracle USA, Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am by PRATER, DUNCAN & CRAIG 770-253-7778
 Finally a lot of them were for "SHOW" and were not and never will be collectible.Anyway:  Here they are: 1 $1,300,000,000 Intellectual Property Oracle USA Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Oracle USA Inc.: In the closely-watched intellectual property case, the justices will determine the scope of available costs that may be recovered in a copyright infringement action. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Oracle USA Inc., which asks whether the term “full costs” awarded to a prevailing party in a copyright case is limited to taxable costs or also authorizes nontaxable costs. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 1:42 pm
"  Read more here (from USA Today). [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:10 pm by Mark Walsh
Oracle USA Inc., about whether “full costs” in the Copyright Act means the costs specified in a general federal costs statute. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Oracle USA Inc., in which the justices will consider next week whether the term “full costs” awarded to a prevailing party in a copyright case is limited to taxable costs or also authorizes nontaxable costs. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Report and Blog)   Global - Patents New exchange, Intellectual Property Exchange International, can be a game-changer, but will need good patents to thrive (IAM) (Technology Transfer Tactics)   Australia Bittersweet decision for Mars but Cadbury settles purple dispute: Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Sweet Rewards Pty Ltd (Managing IP) (ipwars)   Belgium Belgian Supreme Court prohibits fishing expeditions: Ineos Manufacturing Belgium NV and Ineos Services… [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Oracle USA Inc., the justices ruled unanimously that the term “full costs” awarded to a prevailing party in a copyright case is limited to taxable costs and does not include nontaxable costs such as expert-witness fees. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism (IAM) The… [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
Oracle America, Inc. 14-410Issue: Whether copyright protection extends to all elements of an original work of computer software, including a system or method of operation, that an author could have written in more than one way. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
It may not: Oracle won an important victory against Google when an U.S. appeals court decided Oracle could copyright parts of the Java programming language, which Google used to design its Android smartphone operating system - although use could still fall u [read post]