Search for: "Orange v. Commonwealth" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2017, 6:07 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Even if substantive consolidation proves unavailable, the oversight board or the Commonwealth may still seek to confirm a joint plan of adjustment for the Commonwealth and related issuers of Commonwealth debt by using PROMESA’s incorporated cramdown power, arguing that it can be imposed on all holders of Commonwealth debt so long as one impaired class of creditors of a single Commonwealth issuer votes to approve the plan. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 8:21 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Orange teen critical after Christmas Eve hunting accident, December 27, 2016, By Domenic Poli, The Recorder More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
” With respect to the commonwealth, the oversight board and the commonwealth government are relying largely on PPPs to generate near-term growth, and, regardless of how one views the likelihood of achieving that objective, the text and intent of PROMESA make it difficult for creditors and other stakeholders to question or challenge that reliance. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 8:56 pm by Jon Katz
How sad that this great innovation for the jury location in the courtroom was offset by Virginia’s shameful past of slavery that gave way to its shameful Jim Crow history that carried right into 1966 with the Commonwealth’s going kicking and screaming before the Supreme Court fighting unsuccessfully to salvage segregated marriage in Loving v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 2:00 pm by Kevin
Orange County auto mechanics caught in insurance sting operation. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 4:44 am
Jesus Guerra (Slaw) (TorrentFreak) (Managing IP) District Court of The Hague deviates from German BGH Orange Book decision: Philips prevails again: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm by Bexis
Ct. 1937 (2009), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 9:22 pm by Barry Eagar
Using Section 122(1)(a)(i) to qualify Section 122(1)(a)(i) is comparing apples with oranges. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:06 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Consider that defective air bags case above: [W]e will briefly review the history of products liability law and the crashworthiness doctrine in this Commonwealth. [read post]