Search for: "Oregon Republican Party v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
” In Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:10 pm
The plaintiffs in Applewhite v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Even in the follow-up order in Wheaton College v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court denied cert in Cotterman v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:42 pm
Circuit’s opinion in Republican National Committee v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
But we could have a situation in which California moves from its current position of consistently producing two Democrat and zero Republican Senators (a net plus-two for the Democratic Party) to a situation in which the Californias could produce as few as four or five Democrats and as many as seven or eight Republicans (resulting in a net minus-two or even minus-four for the Democratic Party.) [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 11:17 am
Reynolds — did not take advantage of the amendment to raise more money or to coordinate his spending with his political party, the Republican Party. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 2:23 pm
I think that issue was disposed in the 1975 case of Durkin v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
The study’s emphasis on early-voting options meant states like Washington and Oregon, where voting is conducted entirely by mail, ended up at the top of the rankings. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am
Colorado Ethics Watch argued the committee is controlled and coordinates with the Republican Party, and because of that, is subject to the same contribution limits as political parties. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
Congress had abrogated that decision by statute, but part of the deal on repealing Prohibition was to insure local option as a constitutional matter.The Twenty-Sixth Amendment was necessary because the Supreme Court decided in Oregon v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:48 pm
Ron Wyden of Oregon. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 10:30 pm
In NFIB v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Or at least harder than getting voters (even in red states) to see the virtues of the plan; polling data generally confirm that Republican voters in red states embrace NPV much more than do Republican legislative officials in those states. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Oregon, which basically eviscerated the Free Exercise Clause as an independent source of constitutional rights. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 8:20 am
The latest case, Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:32 pm
Presently, fusion candidacies are allowed in only eight states: Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Mississippi, New York, Oregon, South Carolina, and Vermont. [read post]
