Search for: "Oregon v. C. P." Results 61 - 80 of 200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Nov. 15, 2007) (“[p]rescription drugs are not susceptible to a design defect claim where, as here, the drug is “accompanied by proper directions and warning”); Hackett v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:53 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 (1972), así como también la determinación en Johnson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 7:29 am by Richard Hunt
 A similar approach was taken by the Ninth Circuit in Oregon Paralyzed Veterans of Am. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
App. 2007) (adopting Restatement Third §2(c) regarding warnings; “[a]bsent controlling Arizona law to the contrary, we generally follow the Restatement”); Southwest Pet Products, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:03 pm by Andrew Koppelman
C-09-2292-VRW, slip op. at 135 (N.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Charles Pfizer & Co., 532 P.2d 1377, 1381 (Okla. 1974).Oregon: Oksenholt v. [read post]