Search for: "Oregon v. Ramos"
Results 21 - 40
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2020, 5:16 pm
Today in Ramos v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 6:42 am
In Ramos v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 1:34 pm
In April, the Supreme Court ruled in Ramos v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 7:26 am
So the Supreme Court just held this morning, in an opinion (Ramos v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 8:47 am
It did't want to wait for a circuit court to rule: that is, the Ninth Circuit would (likely) hold that Ramos was retroactive for an Oregon case, and the Fifth Circuit would (likely) hold that Ramos was not retroactive for a Louisiana case. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:24 am
In Ramos v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 4:55 am
But the Ramos opinion left open the question of whether the decision applied retroactively.The case decided by the court on Monday, Edwards v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 11:01 am
ShareThe Supreme Court on Monday ruled by a vote of 6-3 that inmates whose convictions became final before last year’s decision in Ramos v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:01 pm
A little over a year ago, in Ramos v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
On Monday, in Ramos v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 7:38 am
In Ramos v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 1:23 pm
As the Statesman-Journal reports, a 2015 Oregon Appeals Court ruling (State v Rabanales-Ramos – 273 Or App 228 (2015)) took a narrow view of the Oregon distracted driving law (ORS 811.507), essentially creating a loophole for all forms of distracted driving other than talking on the phone or texting. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 1:23 pm
As the Statesman-Journal reports, a 2015 Oregon Appeals Court ruling (State v Rabanales-Ramos – 273 Or App 228 (2015)) took a narrow view of the Oregon distracted driving law (ORS 811.507), essentially creating a loophole for all forms of distracted driving other than talking on the phone or texting. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
This means that in Louisiana and Oregon, the two states that previously allowed nonunanimous juries to convict, any final, nonunanimous jury convictions will remain in effect, undisturbed by the Court’s recent holding in Ramos v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 6:37 am
Legal Community Assesses Impact of Unanimous Jury Verdict Requirement in Ramos v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 10:39 am
Just last term, in Timbs v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 2:23 pm
” California v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 9:37 am
And in a Sixth Amendment case, Ramos v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:01 pm
Second up is Ramos v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:38 pm
Oregon and Johnson v. [read post]
