Search for: "Orkin v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 40
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2012, 7:40 am
Saldukas, 896 So. 2d 707, 711 (Fla. 2005), but such agreements are subject to state law contract defenses such as unconscionability, Orkin Exterminating Co. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
We discuss briefly the final installment (in the District Court) of the attempt to recover possession of a Van Gogh drawing allegedly sold away from the plaintiff’s great-grandmother “under duress during the Nazi era in Germany for fraction of its fair value”, Orkin v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:27 pm by AALRR
AT&T Mobility LLC., the United States District Court for the Northern District of California agreed with the conclusion of the court in Quevedo v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 1:55 pm by AALRR
AT& T Mobility LLC., the United States District Court for the Northern District of California agreed with the conclusion of the court in Quevedo v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
Orkin Exterminating Co., [639 S.W.2d 431 (Tenn. 1982)]; Medlin v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 9:39 am
In 2007, another 3-member panel of the Ninth Circuit, in Orkin v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 12:17 am
United States, 226 U.S. 20, 41 (1912); Allied Tube & 7 Conduit Corp. v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 11:27 am
Because theHolocaust Victims Redress Act, according to Judge Thomas, doesn't create a private right of action (which seems pretty right) and the plaintiffs' state law claims are time-barred (ditto).Art law. [read post]