Search for: "Osgood v. Medical, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: Reasonable royalty damages for indirect infringement not limited to ‘Specific Acts of Infringement’: Tyco Healthcare Group LP d/b/a Vnus Medical Technologies v. biolitec, Inc. et al. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
(Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat) dismisses Abbott’s application for specific disclosure of documents in action concerning medical stents: Abbott v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D Texas: False marking intent to deceive may be inferred from marking of expired patent numbers: Patent Compliance Group Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.; McNamara v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
– FDA’s approval letter for Orchid’s ANDA for generic Clarinex sets new 180-day exclusivity forfeiture (FDA Law Blog) Cozaar (Losartan) / Hyzaar (Hydrochlorothiazide, Losartan) – US: Rarely used exception to the first permitted commercial marketing/use PTE criterion (FDA Law Blog) Cozaar (Losartan) / Hyzaar (Hydrochlorothiazide, Losartan) – US: Generic Cozaar/Hyzaar 180-day exclusivity – Teva wins, FDA too (despite itself) in the Columbia District Court (FDA Law… [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Shure, Inc (GRAY on Claims) (Patently-O) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC on relative claim terminology: Power-One, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC: Panel disagrees regarding use of incorporation by reference to identify structure for means-plus-function claims: Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:30 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al. and Gilead Sciences, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
CAS Medical Systems, Inc (Docket Report) District Court M D Pennsylvania: Conflicting claim constructions preclude finding of wilfulness: Arlington Industries v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
CAS Medical Systems, Inc (Docket Report) District Court M D Pennsylvania: Conflicting claim constructions preclude finding of wilfulness: Arlington Industries v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:05 am
(IP Osgoode) Australia: University of Western Australia’s application to appeal FCAFC’s decision in University of Western Australia v Gray fails (IP Whiteboard) Colombia/EU/Peru: Tough IP health provisions in Europe’s Colombia/Peru trade deal (IP Watch) (IP tango) EU: Something more about Swiss type claims: G02/08 (SiNApSE) (SiNApSE) US: Pharmaceutical patent settlements – and what about patients? [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:05 am
(IP Osgoode) Australia: University of Western Australia’s application to appeal FCAFC’s decision in University of Western Australia v Gray fails (IP Whiteboard) Colombia/EU/Peru: Tough IP health provisions in Europe’s Colombia/Peru trade deal (IP Watch) (IP tango) EU: Something more about Swiss type claims: G02/08 (SiNApSE) (SiNApSE) US: Pharmaceutical patent settlements – and what about patients? [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Montgomery Ward & Co (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (GRAY On Claims) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) District Court S D Iowa: Intent to deceive inferred when plaintiff adds element to patent claims to overcome rejection but fails to disclose prior art containing that element: Sabasta et al v Buckaroos, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D New York: Failure to disclose specific combination of prior art precludes invalidity argument based on such combination: Metso Minerals,… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(Plameco) (EPLAW) The Hague District Court: Cease and desist declaration only binding to the parties, not a natural or legal person signing on behalf of one of the parties: Metaco Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) TTAB dismisses 2(d) opposition, finding BELL HILL for wine and BELL’S for beer too dissimilar: Bell's Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(IP Osgoode) DCI – Trade dress suit over Danish cookie tins: DCI v Danco Import (The Trademark Blog) Nordic Windpower – Nordic files trade mark infringement suit against Nordic Turbin [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
Jude Medical (IP Frontline) (PatLit) District Court N D California grants summary judgment of invalidity based on on-sale bar: PartsRiver, Inc v Shopzilla, Inc et al (EDTexweblog.com) District Court N D Illinois: Subjective colours require definition to avoid indefiniteness: On the First Ltd v Seiko Epson Corp (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Supreme Court asked to hear Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc – Should… [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
Anjani Kumar Goenka & Anr (IP Frontline) Hollywood v Bollywood v Tollywood: When is ‘plagiarism’ equal to ‘copyright infringement’? [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:35 am
(Spicy IP) Coversyl (Perindopril) – Canada: Court of Appeal upholds Trial Division finding of patent validity and infringement: Apotex v ADIR (Pharmacapsules@Gowlings) Cozaar (Losartan) – France: French Patent Office grants paediatric extension of French SPC for Losartan (The SPC Blog) Cozaar/Hyzaar (Losartan) – US: FDA prevails in generic Cozaar/Hyzaar 180-day exclusivity forfeiture litigation: Teva Pharmaceuticals v Sebelius (FDA Law Blog) Diflucan… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(IP finance) Patent perishables – The effects on a company’s patent portfolio when it goes bust (IPEG) Canada Supreme Court rejects application to appeal procedural ruling in copyright case over photos showing marijuana plants growing in the plaintiff’s residence: Agnieska Wojtanowska, et al v Daniel Mustard, et al (Excess Copyright) Federal Court sets high standard of evidentiary detail, reaffirms local distinctiveness in trademark expungement case:… [read post]
