Search for: "Other Interested Parties Amended" Results 41 - 60 of 18,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2010, 8:14 am by David Gans
Far from being “good politics” or “good constitutional design,” the system led to rampant and blatant corruption, letting corporations and other moneyed interests effectively buy U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:29 am by Michelle Buhalo
Bertin, a partner at the law firm Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel, notes that this amended law largely "impact(s) standing for grandparents and third parties". [read post]
” In this case, Judge Alsup amended the schedule to alleviate the prejudice to the other party. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 5:00 pm by William D. Jewett
On July 27, 2022, the Department of Labor (DOL) proposed a set of amendments to Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption 84-14, the so-called “QPAM Exemption,” which permits an investment fund[1] holding assets of ERISA plans and IRAs that is managed by a Qualified Professional Asset Manager (“QPAM”) to engage in transactions with parties in interest to those plans or IRAs, subject to certain conditions. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:54 am by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
Second, the relevant Fourth Amendment doctrines—the third-party and special needs doctrines—are, even by the standards of constitutional law, in flux and without much coherence. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 11:22 am by Mark Graber
  Being interested in people who could actually follow directions, Slate decided the below did not quite fit the project. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in particular, argued for a more fundamental reconsideration of third-party rule, which holds that people have no privacy interest in information shared with a third party. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:09 pm
  Any party challenging the project must concurrently file all its other claims regarding land use approvals. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 2:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
Compelled subsidies of others' speech happen all the time, and are not generally viewed as burdening any First Amendment interest. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 6:05 pm by Richard Burt
Amendments to the books and records of the LLC showed Feresi as a member with a 12.5 percent ownership interest. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Interest group contributions account for at most a small amount of the variation. [read post]
In other words, who will be the ultimate party responsible for funding the non-participating owner’s royalty burden during the riskiest part of the venture of drilling a well: the non-participating owner who agreed to do so or the unit operator without contractual privity but a statutory duty to remit another’s royalty burden? [read post]
DGCL Section 251(h) does not apply to transactions in which a party to the merger agreement is an “interested stockholder” of the target under DGCL Section203(c) at the time the merger agreement is approved by the target board. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:07 am by Samuel Cohen
By taking an equity stake or some other form of interest in a party to the litigation, a funder could potentially bring themselves within the permitted exception to the general rule that allows for litigation funding by a third-party with a legitimate interest in the proceedings. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 4:00 am by R. David Donoghue
Pursuant to Amended Local Rule 3.2, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, shall file a statement identifying all its Affiliates, defined as Any entity or individual owning 5% or more of a party. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 5:55 am by Michael Dreeben
The Supreme Court’s recognition of third-party standing in other contexts supports the application of those principles here. [read post]
The District Court, however, found that other courts had held that if a subrogee had paid an entire loss suffered by an insured, it was the only real party in interest and the only party that might sue in its own name. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 3:29 pm by John Day
  While the rule should be construed liberally, the Court of Appeals noted six factors that militate against allowing an amendment:  (1) undue delay in seeking to amend; (2) repeated failures by the moving party to cure deficiencies in earlier amendments (3) lack of notice to the opposing party; (4) futility of the amendment; (5) bad faith or dilatory motive of the moving party; (6) undue prejudice to the opposing… [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:24 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLC
” As a result of Rosa’s interest in the property and the business there was a mutuality of interest with the other parties. [read post]