Search for: "Other John Doe Entities 1-3" Results 21 - 40 of 1,074
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm by Lisa Baird
Currently, a CLIA laboratory may only disclose laboratory test results to three categories of individuals or entities: (1) the “authorized person,” (2) the health care provider who will use the test results for treatment purposes, and (3) the laboratory that initially requested the test. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:03 pm by Kara OBrien
The short answer to the question of whether the ethical rules literally apply to lawyers other than in the course of providing legal advice is that, in general, they literally do not (except for the rules on moral turpitude[1]). [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Doe will file under seal within ten (10) days of the date of this Order a disclosure of the identity of any other party or entity (other than his family and Jane Roe) who may have a direct interest in the outcome of the litigation. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:44 pm by Seth Smiley
There are four basic categories of business that can be formed by an individual or groups of individuals: 1) sole proprietor, 2) partnership, 3) limited liability company (aka LLC) and 4) corporation (aka Inc.). [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:25 am by Scott Hervey
Clearly there is no love lost between John Wayne Enterprises, LLC (“JWE”), the entity owned by John Wayne’s heirs which controls the intellectual property related to of John Wayne, and Duke University. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by John Jascob
” An agent will not be deemed to be independent if: (1) at the time it provides the valuation, the valuation agent or any affiliated person beneficially owns more than 5 percent of the class of securities to be listed, including any right to receive any such securities exercisable within 60 days; (2) the valuation agent or any affiliated entity has provided any investment banking services to the listing applicant within the 12 months preceding the date of the valuation; or… [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 3:11 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Plaintiff sued some unknown “John Doe” defendants who infringed plaintiff’s copyrights. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 7:47 am by John Jascob
Tarasevich advised that there are three main rules related to regulated entities and cyber incidents: (1) Regulation S-P, which requires investment advisers and broker-dealers to have policies and procedures in place reasonably designed to protect customer information; (2) Regulation S-ID, which protects against identity theft and applies to investment advisers, broker-dealers, and investment companies; and (3) Regulation SCI, which only applies to approximately 45… [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
This Court’s jurisprudence recognises that Convention rights are not applied in a vacuum2 but are to be interpreted in light of and in harmony with other international law standards and obligations,3 including under treaty and customary international law.4 1 United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCRH), Report: Analytical study on the relationship between climate change and the full and effective enjoyment of the rights of the child, 4 May 2017,… [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:05 am by William S. Dodge
Australia (art. 3(1)) limits these entities to ones that can be considered an “agency or instrumentality” of a foreign state. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:07 am by Kali Borkoski
§ 2244(d)(1) due to “the date on which the judgment became final by the conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review. 3. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:53 am by John Jascob
The September 1 date applies only to swaps between the largest swap dealers, which is transactions between counterparties that each have $3 trillion in gross exposure. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
And, the fact that gambling, or any other industry, is subject to one regulatory regime does not mean that it is not subject to any others. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 3:38 am
The Board held that use of the wholly-owned subsidiary's registered mark by a parent entity does not inure to the benefit of its subsidiary when the parent controls the nature and quality of the goods. [read post]