Search for: "Ovalle v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 265
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2022, 7:41 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Indeed, you can imagine a case captioned "Cheney v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 6:02 am by Jack Goldsmith
” As the Supreme Court stated in Department of the Navy v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
8/5/1974: Shortly after the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
But instead of harnessing the power of the Oval Office by ordering military or police intervention or exhorting the rioters to go home, Trump continued to fan the flames of discord, and remained focused on trying to overturn the 2020 election, even as his aides implored him to stop the violence. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:07 am by Douglas London
For all the political tumult demanding – and exhausting – the attention of Americans – the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:11 am by David Post
In brief: What the statistical analyses actually show is that (A) the odds of obtaining the reported results in any of the four states if the 2020 voting population had precisely the same Dem. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm by Richard Hunt
The last gasp was an effort to stop the federal lawsuit because there was a parallel state court action based entirely on state law principles. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:51 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Leavitt, the first ISDEAA contract support costs case, and United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:13 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
Typically, the state delegates the authority to regulate the admission of attorneys to practice in that state to a bar organization or other state-based institution. [read post]
16 Oct 2021, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Puerto Ricans have American citizenship and are able to travel throughout the U.S. mainland as they please – and it’s under the jurisdiction of the current occupant of the Oval Office. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 9:05 pm by Richard Briffault
In addition, the Recorder worked to include in the instructions provided with absentee ballots permission for voters to strike out a mistake and complete the correct oval rather than treat the ballot as spoiled and apply for a new one, as state law provides. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
8/5/1974: Shortly after the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
New online from Law and History Review and Cambridge Core: From Disestablishment to Dartmouth College v. [read post]