Search for: "Ovalle v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 265
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2019, 9:06 am
It was just a few months ago that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (BMB v Ferrero, C‑693/17 P) sided with well-known foodstuffs manufacturer Ferrero by upholding the invalidity of a registered Community design right for comfit boxes and containers pursuant to Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 1:55 pm
REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM As a candidate, Trump promised to overturn Roe v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:35 am
" There is very little case law that guides this issue, but the Second Circuit relies on United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926). [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
Nixon refused to turn over the tapes made in the Oval Office, lost in the US Supreme Court in US v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:09 am
Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:27 pm
On July 24, 1974 a unanimous Supreme Court ordered Nixon to turn over the tapes in (the aptly-named) US v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 10:07 am
Barr, No. 18-776, and Ovalles v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:36 pm
Barr and Ovalles v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm
” Placing so much responsibility in the hands of “a couple hundred unaccountable staffers,” moreover, contributes to the concern that there is a “conspiratorial deep state [that] threatens the nation’s representative democracy. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am
Hours later, President-Elect Trump tweeted, ‘Great move on delay (by V. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 10:12 am
Wing Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 5:06 am
Attorney General Barr and Ovalles v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:06 am
Barr and Ovalles v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
(relisted after the June 13 conference) Ovalles v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
I strongly believe that anyone getting to the Oval Office should, as in France and the American state of Georgia (putting voter suppression to one side), be able to make a demonstrable claim of support by the majority of the electorate, as through a run-off or use of the Alternative Transferrable Vote (now adopted in Maine). [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
Near v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
” It was important for the House to enhance the judiciary committee’s subpoena powers in 1974 and 1998 because of the state of the chamber’s rules at the time. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
”— President Lyndon Johnson and Chief Justice Earl Warren, Oval Office, June 13, 1968 QUESTION: Your subtitle refers to the “modern” Supreme Court. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:47 am
And third, as Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner have pointed out, the Supreme Court did not apply a clear statement in United States v. [read post]
