Search for: "Ovalles v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2017, 9:30 am
This oft-cited dictum from United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:30 am
In Matal v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am
United States, by a vote of six to three, the Court held that a federal district court has the discretion to order a federal criminal sentence to run after a state criminal sentence that is anticipated but has not yet been imposed. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 10:34 am
I hope the decision-makers at those companies will focus not only on their employees from and customers in certain countries but also appreciate the President's efforts to protect them.Thankfully, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has published several documents relating to State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sandy began complaining about the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 6:16 am
The Supreme Court has often affirmed, many times since United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:31 pm
See Exergen, Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Powell met with Trump in the Oval Office and can thus testify to Trump's statements that are relevant to his state of mind. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 12:41 pm
To organize those rallies, IRA employees posed as U.S. grassroots entities and persons and made contact with Trump supporters and Trump Campaign officials in the United States. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
Article I, for example, provided that Clinton “willfully corrupted and manipulated the judicial process of the United States” by “impeding the administration of justice. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
Spending over six pages detailing United States v. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:23 am
And no, the world did not stop while the United States gazed at the presidential navel. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
There have been three landmark cases issued by the Supreme Court during the last generation or two concerning the extent to which the presidency and the executive branch should be immune from legal and judicial processes and orders that would require disclosure of executive information and/or consumption of executive time: the famous Nixon Tapes case, United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:10 am
’ Since the earliest days of the Republic, ‘every man’ has included the President of the United States. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:47 am
And third, as Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner have pointed out, the Supreme Court did not apply a clear statement in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:11 am
In brief: What the statistical analyses actually show is that (A) the odds of obtaining the reported results in any of the four states if the 2020 voting population had precisely the same Dem. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:04 pm
COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Defraud the United States-18 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:28 pm
In a rare address from the Oval Office yesterday evenin, President Barack Obama discussed the administration’s response to the rising threat of domestic terrorism in the United States following last Wednesday’s shooting in San Bernardino. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
(relisted after the June 13 conference) Ovalles v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:49 am
Trump v. [read post]
