Search for: "Ovalles v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2022, 11:01 am by J. William Leonard
Unless the United States can convince a partner nation that their information can be adequately protected, they may be dissuaded from sharing it, thus placing the United States and its citizens at increased risk. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am by Elina Saxena
Reflecting on President Obama's Sunday night address from the Oval Office, Bobby highlighted the President’s most interesting remarks on terrorism and the U.S. strategy against the Islamic State. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:31 am by Adam Chandler
” Commentary on the Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
 The  United States Supreme Court has started every session since February 1, 1790  with "Oyez Oyez..........God save the United States and this honorable Court". [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
ACSblog highlights a recent American Constitution Society issue brief on state laws that bar people with criminal records from voting, in light of the Court’s recent call for the views of the Solicitor General in Simmons v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Its survival may hinge on just one vote—that of United States Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
The Supreme Court justices in the Youngstown steel seizure case faced the question of the emergency authority of the President of the United States, not of the person of Harry S. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am by Adam Chandler
” The New York Law Journal analyzes the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 9:05 pm by Richard Briffault
The administration of elections in the United States—including elections for federal office—is highly decentralized. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am by Mark Graber
United States (1926), but they never acknowledge that the Brandeis dissent was rooted in a commitment to participatory democracy that Reynolds did not share. [read post]