Search for: "Owens v. Commissioner of Correction" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2016, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
  This is more problematic and ties in with the code of practice issued by the Information Commissioner’s Office on the issue of surveillance cameras, which is the document widely shared online. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:51 am by Dr Mark Summerfield
  Section 36 provides for the Commissioner to make determinations regarding the correct ‘eligible persons’ on a patent application, i.e. the persons (natural or corporate) entitled by invention, assignment or other transfer of title, to be the owner of any patent ultimately granted. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Blog Editorial
Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland), Scottish Widows plc No.2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) and Scottish Widows plc (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard Monday 16 – Thursday 19 May 2011. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
We have now been provided with a copy of the statement in open court read on 4 November 2016 [pdf] before Dingemans J in the case of Suresh v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has published the outcome of a compulsory audit of the Department for Education DFE carried out in February 2020. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
Poynter’s Craig Silverman flags up a podcast in which he talks about online verification and corrections with Journalism.co.uk’s Rachel McAthy. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
Defendants appealed, and the trial court judge, Judge Owens, approved Defendant's application for a zone change. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am by INFORRM
The first witness during the Monday morning hearing was DAC Sue Akers, QPM, a deputy assistant commissioner of the Metropolitan Police. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Paul Stern
If compensating injured parties was the sole purpose of constitutional tort law, the rationale would best be effectuated through a remedial regime akin to what Justice Lewis Powell referred to as strict liability in Owens v. [read post]