Search for: "Owens v. United States Department of the Army" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
A group of 50 organisations and nearly 90 individual experts have signed a statement against the US Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) proposal to ask non-citizens to provide the passwords to their social media accounts in order to enter the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
It is reported that 90% of voters in the United States support the right to delete links to personal information. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:37 am by Melina Padron
He concludes that the limiting effects Protocol 30 will have will be minimal (if any at all), but reminds his readers that we may be getting a definitive answer on the matter once the case of NS v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-411/10) is decided by the CJEU. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Justice Department announced that Plains All American Pipeline and several of its operating subsidiaries have agreed to spend approximately $41 million to upgrade 10,420 miles of crude oil pipeline operated in the United States. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
Department of Justice Press Release, December 22, 2009 A settlement estimated worth more than $30 million will ensure that cleanup of the Sutton Brook Disposal Area Superfund Site in Tewksbury, Mass., will move forward, the Justice Department and U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
Department of Justice Press Release, December 22, 2009 A settlement estimated worth more than $30 million will ensure that cleanup of the Sutton Brook Disposal Area Superfund Site in Tewksbury, Mass., will move forward, the Justice Department and U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-149, before Judge Owen, in which "John Doe" defendants represented by Ray Beckerman and Ty Rogers brought motions to (a) vacate the ex parte discovery order on the ground that it had not been supported by competent evidence of a prima facie copyright infringment case, (b) quash the subpoena on that ground plus the additional ground [read post]