Search for: "Oxley v. Oxley"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2008, 6:08 pm
In Guyden v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 11:21 am
The PCAOB (and Sarbanes-Oxley) Lives! [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:00 am
” Rhinehimer v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:00 am
As we’ve previously discussed on Suits by Suits, the Supreme Court will decide in its next term whether Sarbanes-Oxley protects employees of privately-owned corporations, in Lawson v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:00 am
Jones v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:00 pm
The case is Yates v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[xiii] Yates v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:35 pm
Sylvester v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:50 pm
In Tides v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:29 am
John v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
In my forthcoming article, I discuss Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 and the administrative legacy its implementation history has had on the SEC. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 2:41 pm
For much of the oral argument in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 4:54 am
My travel yesterday took a page from "Planes, Trains & Automobiles" - so it was humorous to first see a CNBC text that the stock market was up because the US Supreme Court had stricken the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, only to find out that the 5-4 decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:46 am
Leshinsky v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:11 am
” SEC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
In Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 11:33 am
Will Sarbanes-Oxley Fall? [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Bechtel v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 8:46 am
Law360 writes about the recent Sarbanes-Oxley ("SOX") decision issued by the Department of Labor's Administrative Review Board ("ARB") in Kalkunte v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 1:41 pm
The case is Wiest v. [read post]
