Search for: "P AND P v. Children's Services Division"
Results 21 - 40
of 246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
Raksa, DAGDesignee of Department of Human Services: Barbara G. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm
Y v Z (Publicity: Sch 1 Proceedings) [2014] EWHC 650 (Fam), [2014] 2 FLR (forthcoming and reported above at p 973) is a judgment on appeal before Bodey J with a rather different factual background, and where the use of material was constrained not by s 98 but by the duty of confidentiality that flows from the duty of full and frank disclosure in financial proceedings. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:53 am
M-07 Graham Windham Services to Families and Children . . . . . [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
The Appellate Division observed that in Brooke, the Court of Appeals overruled Matter of Alison D. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
The Appellate Division observed that in Brooke, the Court of Appeals overruled Matter of Alison D. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:50 am
On 7 December 2018, Sir Andrew McFarlane, the President of the Family Division [pic], issued some practice guidance to judges entitled Practice Guidance: anonymisation and avoidance of the identification of children and the treatment of explicit descriptions of the sexual abuse of children in judgments intended for the public arena (see January [2019] Fam Law 68). [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
("the Children"). [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am
The Appellate Division affirmed. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:07 am
Arbitrator Joseph P. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:48 am
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 11:31 am
On June 14, 2006, mother applied for the services of the Virginia Department of Social Services, Division of Child Support Enforcement (hereafter DCSE) to enforce the October 20, 1966 child support order. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
GUY P. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 10:41 am
I noted that the recent Appellate Division case of Maeker v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
Thus, for example, charging a fee for a service (such as a set rate for feeding cattle, baling hay or harvesting crops) constitutes an “agricultural business” to which workers’ compensation applies.[8] Kansas caselaw shows that whether an activity is an agricultural activity is difficult to determine. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:15 pm
” (Dissent at p. 22) 3. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
The defendant in Gagne sought access to, among other things, privileged counseling records in the possession of the New Hampshire Division for Children and Youth Services. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 7:05 am
In McCabe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
P. 25.2(d). [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Such was the holding of the Appellate Division, Second Department, in its November 13, 2013 decision in Dee v. [read post]
