Search for: "P B"
Results 301 - 320
of 17,442
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2023, 8:03 am
En concreto, la cuestión casacional admitida en su día consistía en: Determinar los requisitos que configuran el concepto de acoso sexual, en concreto, de acoso por razón de sexo del artículo 7 de la L.O. 3/2007, de 22 de marzo, de Igualdad Efectiva de Mujeres y Hombres, de manera que se precise si tiene que concurrir una solicitud de favor sexual, o si puede concurrir ese carácter con actitudes ambiguas, a efectos de que se considere como falta muy… [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 8:08 pm
Aquí la Corte toma su primera decisión (de muchas que vendrán en el mismo expediente) y hace un encuadre "policéntrico" para dar tutela al bien colectivo del ambiente: exigirá informes a las empresas involucradas en la contaminación, al Estado Nacional, de Provincia de Buenos Aires y de Nación, y llevará todo a una audiencia pública. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 12:29 pm
b) La declaración de la autoridad competente mediante la cual establezca la duración de la pena privativa de libertad a la que será concretamente sometida la persona reclamada. 5. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:58 am
Although they argue that full scope enablement is a relatively novel requirement, they recognize that it had been imposed before Amgen, including to antibodies (see p. 1030–31). [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:19 am
‘In order to cater to the need of users who may require, in certain instances, to update representative’s data as entered on the CMS, the following functionality is now available: “Application to change the details of a representative in a pending case pursuant to RgR16.1(b)”. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 4:23 am
Muchos años después, luego de jurar en la Corte, afirmará que lo hizo porque "no le cerraban los precios" de una licitación de cárceles que había promovido el Ministerio de Obras Públicas. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
Howell, Graham P. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:24 pm
St-Sauveur se dit atterré à l’idée de « tout perdre », mais son propre témoignage au sujet des deux bâtiments annexés, et le rapport P-9 de l’évaluateur agréé Claude Gauthier, font réaliser que le terrain, situé en zone résidentielle, vaut probablement plus cher une fois débarrassé de bâtiments vétustes, inutilisables, lugubres et… [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:11 am
B) ARTÍCULOS DE EXCELENCIA. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Rule 9(b) does require particularized pleadings in fraud actions, but again Rule 9 is inapplicable to Section 11 (which is not a fraud cause of action).[12] Particularized pleading is the exception, not the rule. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
James B. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
The EUIPO issued a refusal of the IR based on lack of distinctiveness (Art. 7(1)(b) EUTMR). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
” 2) “An Apple is not an Apple”, at least according to the Swiss Federal Administrative Court… by Peter Schramm “With Judgment of 8 March 2023 (B-1974/2022), the Swiss Federal Administrative Court confirmed the rejection of an opposition by Apple against a trademark showing another stylized apple motif. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 8:42 pm
Peor aún, el 10 de junio Maqueda le escribe (y hace pública) esta nota, de la que extraemos dos párrafos:Los argentinos han sido sorprendidos por sus declaraciones. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm
The Supreme Court, in Lord Sales judgment, restates the starting position, as per R v East Sussex County Council, Ex p Tandy (1998) AC 714, that where Parliament imposes a statutory duty on a public authority to provide a specific benefit or service, it does so on the footing that the authority must be taken to have the resources available to comply with that duty. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Demande en répétition de l’indu. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The dispute before Indiana Judge Matthew P. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:03 am
‘Our primary filing was a request under Rule 262.1(b) of the UPC Rules of Procedure requesting that the Munich section of the central division make available to us all written pleadings and evidence filed on case no ACT_464985/2023. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
The Judge noted that the basic requirements before a Norwich Pharmacal order could be made were that: (1) a wrong had been carried out, or arguably carried out, by an ultimate wrongdoer; (2) an order was needed to enable action to be brought against the ultimate wrongdoer; and (3) the person against whom the order was sought was (a) mixed up in, so as to have facilitated, the wrongdoing; and (b) able or likely to be able to provide the information necessary to enable the… [read post]
